Category Archives: politics
Can I Get a “Word” on This “The Word”
My Other Boyfriend is the coolest ever. *SWOON*
Dear Senator Hillary Clinton
Florida And Michigan Must Be Counted.
If the Democratic Party leadership does not find a way to seat the delegates from Michigan and Florida, either by holding a re-vote (which I think is needed in Michigan, as all the candidate’s names were not on the ballot), or finding some way to count the votes that were cast in the Primaries, McCain will win by default.
John McCain will become the next President.
Not because the nominee will be un-electable.
Not because legions of disgruntled Obama or Clinton supporters will cross party lines to vote for McCain.
Because the election will be stolen.
As it was in 2000, and in 2004.
And a party that has selected its nominee on the backs of the blatant, public disenfranchisement of millions of voters will have no moral authority to stand up to sneaky tactics like “malfunctioning” machines, misleading poll information, confusing ballots, hackers, misdirection, ID challenges, and caging lists. Much less a U.S. Supreme Court that leans even farther to the right than the one that handed George W. Bush the election he lost.
And I know, I know, there are “rules” that were broken. But here’s the thing. Those rules were broken by politicians playing games.
Not by the voters.
We didn’t all get together one day and decide we didn’t want our votes to count.
So the next time you hear someone say, or are tempted to say yourself, “They broke the rules,” I want you to try something. I want you to replace that phrase with one of these ones:
What were you doing on the street at that hour?
He ‘matched the description’ of the suspect.
If you don’t want ‘attention’ don’t dress like that.
Their parents are here illegally.
They’re ‘pushing their lifestyle’ on the public.
She was ‘leading him on’.
He’s a ‘problem child’ who can’t learn.
Because you’re basically making the same argument.
Well That Explains a Few Things…
Jon Needs No Writers
This is your moment
With Super Tuesday coming up I though I would pass this on…
The Nail on the Head
And I think Clinton hit it!
It’s Obama and Huckabee
And all I can muster is one giant “meh”.
If Huck continues on to win the rethuglikan nom, it will be fun watching him squirm out excuses about why he let a convicted rapist out of prison, despite letters from his victims begging him not too, because the rape victim was one of Bill Clinton’s cousins. The rapist then went on to rape and kill 2 women before he was caught. I think his new slogan should be “Huckabee- soft on crime, softer on rapists”
Now for the Obama problem. I can’t put my finger on it, but I have the same ookey feeling about him that I always had for Kucinich. See Kucinich looked for all intents and purposes like the only hard left prog in the race for a long time (including the entire 2004 race) but something about him just seemed wrong. Then he had the great wife search, which was creepy. Then he showed some love to Ron Paul, and I knew he was just a creepy little man who was desperate for both love and votes and willing to sell out women to get both.
When I first heard Obama speak, I was impressed. I was hopeful. But shortly after the ookey feeling started. Part of it was how he slammed people for voting for the Iraq war. I’ve been against the war since long before it started. Hell, the official start date of the war is my birthday and I take it as a personal affront that thinking people somehow thought it was a good idea to invade Iraq.
But Obama likes to run on the fact that he never voted for the war. Of course, he never had too, state governments don’t vote on foreign policy. So it’s not like he’s some Russ Feingold tested holdout. He also likes to use conservative framing for explaining his weak health care policy, and as a president you need to be able to frame the debate yourself, not sell out to the other side. Edwards is good at reframing the debate, Clinton has got some skills too (learned after spending years watching and helping her hubby teflon sidestep rethuglikan framing)
But, like I said before, I will vote for whomever is driving the machine that will get less people killed. That means Obama if he gets the nom. But don’t be surprised if he gets the nom and then runs farther to the right than any dem in recent history in order to prove that he can unify the country. He already likes using conservative framing, it’s not a far leap from just using the framing to using the ideas behind it.
Maybe Hillary is OK
My insomniatic self is watching some Wall Street Journal Review (I think) show with Maria Barteromo interviewing Hillary about sub prime mortgages and tax breaks. When Barteromo starts whining about how repealing the Bush tax cuts will put pressure on people who are already stressed, Hillary cracked up before Maria could even finish the question. Her response , once she finished laughing, was “You’re talking about people who are in the same tax bracket as Bill and I, and we aren’t feeling the pressure”.
That needs to be a media clip played over and over and over, every time a rethuglikan stars whining about taxes. Every single time.