So I made this little comment to Ouyang Dan today “There are all these new bands that I like, but then I see their videos and realize the musicians are super young and I feel like some weird old lady trying to be down with the hip kids”

Whatever, I coined the phrase discopunk! I think I am allowed to enjoy the junior members of the genre. I mean the music of the junior members of the genre.

So I haven’t updated ye old blog since Myspace was a thing and judging by the cluttered template it’s looking a little Myspace-ish. At least I don’t have loud, obnoxious music that blares at you as soon as you type in the address.

So I need to update, streamline, yadda yadda yadda. Maybe it’s time for a new header even. But that sounds like work.

So instead, let’s update the blog roll. If you’re not on it- leave a link. I’ve been trying my damnedest to share the love with other blogs that link here, but I’m not catching all of them in a timely fashion. Apologies! Also if you drop me a link I’ll throw you in my reader and read ya on the regular.

(This includes you Tata. I need to retract my Rick Bayless love and can’t do it without your post.)

Go read.

I could go into how treating oppressed groups as less than, even if your intent is good (roads to hell and all that) is problematic at best. Ladies are delicate creatures not suited to paid work, brown folks are ignorant savages who need to be civilized, poor folks are huddled masses yearning to break free. Of course those characterizations remove agency, as if those huddled masses at Ellis Island didn’t use any courage, bravery or fortitude just crossing vast oceans on the chance at a better life. Noooo, they huddled and yearned and waited for the loving arms of Lady Liberty and Uncle Sam to carry them to destiny. Those brown folks couldn’t possibly had a civilization of their own prior to colonization and slavery. Those delicate ladies would be too worn out by a job, but running a home and raising children isn’t really work.

Poor folks, we don’t need or want your pity. We want our labor to count for just as much as your labor does. We want our kids to have the same chance at schools and jobs and all good things that yours do. We ain’t weak.

I may have occasionally been called a cold-hearted bitch and I would prefer that people continue with that impression. So the fact that this little video just made me blub like a giant baby is just between me and you, and you, and you. Shhhh.

(I’m also a sympathetic cryer. Can’t help it. If someone gets weepy near me I go all waterworks. That is also a big secret.)

LUCK – NYC Wedding Proposal from Aria Melody DJ on Vimeo.

(and yes h/t to Jezebel. And yes I know that site is problematic.)

One of the first and MOST important lesson anyone doing any kind of social justice/anti-oppression work needs to learn is the difference between an institutional problem and an individual problem. Actually, most people understand the difference in a vague sort of way. Where they get tripped up is on the solutions to those things.

Institutional problems are structural in nature, meaning they aren’t the result of one person going wonky but of the whole system being skewed. All oppressions are institutional, ALL OF THEM. That means that no amount of bootstrapping will end poverty, no change of clothing or teetotaling will prevent rape, no new technology or drug will stop abelism. Suggesting that some individual action will fix an institutional problem is like putting up new curtains so your neighbors won’t see your house burning down.

(Mild aside- when I was a wayward teen I used to like the song Institutionalized by the SoCal punk rock group Suicidal Tendencies. Back then I just thought it was a great fuck you to silly grown ups. While thinking about this piece I got that song stuck in my head and now I am thinking that perhaps there was more to that song. Perhaps.)

Some examples of institutional problems and their “common sense” individual “solutions” (yes that’s an overuse of scare quotes. Suck it.)

Climate change- let’s all recycle!Become locovores! Drive hybrids!. The truth is that without institutional reforms that drastically change the structure of society (how we make energy, what requirements we have for manufacturers, etc etc) then we can all sort all the trash, compost and recycling that we want but we’re still going to have climate change. Doesn’t mean you shouldn’t recycle at all, but don’t let that small individual action obfuscate the bigger institutional problem.

Teen Pregnancy: Use condoms. Yeah that’s only part of the reason for teen pregnancy. Poverty, birth control sabotage, older boyfriends with coercive power, a (usually realistic) view that there really isn’t really any benefit to waiting till later to parent, and lack of abortion access are all part of it. Notice that most of these things can’t be solved by an individual, let alone a teenage girl child. This doesn’t mean we shouldn’t provide comprehensive sex ed and access to birth control, but it does mean we should shut the fuck up when it comes to shaming teenagers who decide to parent. That shit don’t fix the problems.

Disability access: Let’s find ways to unbind the wheelchair bound! Wheelchair users aren’t bound. They’re not some damsel in distress tied to the railroad tracks by Snidely Paralysis waiting to be rescued by Dudely DoWright and his Be Healed and Walk Again powers. They need the same things everyone needs, to be able to get through doors and into buildings, to cook meals and take showers and clean their clothes. New technologies are great for individuals, but the focus should be on ensuring universal design practices are universally applied. And disability doesn’t begin with blindness and end with wheelchair users. There are so many different ways a person can be cut off from the basic world that a one size solution would fail.

Chopping onions while dancing to the Gossip is a good way to lose a finger. (Of course not dancing while listening to the Gossip is a scientific impossibility).

And how fucking awesome is Beth Ditto? About a thousand million points of awesome (also a scientific fact)

6 days of protesting over austerity measures. 6 fucking days, not a word in the nooz.

Speaking of protests over austerity measures, I actually had a convo about this last night. (It’s so nice when the reality proves my babbling correct). Austerity doesn’t work as an economic driver because riots and protests over basic things like jobs and food tend to discourage foreign direct investment(FDI). Foreign investors see the country as unstable (rightly so) and put their cash in other places. FDI is important because it is the only way to increase the overall surplus in a closed loop economic system. To shorthand that for you- imagine a country’s resources are a pot of soup and that soup has to be divided among all the people. Regardless of how you divide the soup (equally among everyone, more going to some people and less going to others, whatever) you only have the soup you have in the pot to play with. FDI adds extra soup.

Keynesian economics tries to avoid the riot problem during downturns by having a country borrow from itself during downturns to keep everyone in soup and paying itself back during upturns by increasing taxes. This not only creates a more stable country, but a more stable investment environment. (And yes, I am aware of the problem of speculation creating a vampire investment economy that sucks the life out of the real economy. And yes, I think financial products should be extremely limited and regulated to death. But this post is about a quick and dirty explanation of what we’ve got going on right now and not what a better way of doing things might be).

Latoya Peterson at Racialicious has a pretty good post about If You Haven’t Been On Food Stamps, Stop Trying to Influence Government Policy and what follows is going to be a bit of minor quibbling because I think she’s on the right track.

Food stamps, per the law that created them, are supposed to provide an EMERGENCY food budget only. Think of the food stamp allotment as similar to minimum wage. It is by no means enough for you to live on healthily for an extended period of time. It is just enough to keep you from the most severe effects of malnutrition and hunger, like minimum wage is just enough to keep you above the poverty level but not enough to provide the basics for an extended period of time. Both of these assume that individuals will only be at that level for a short period of time before improving. We all know that there are lots of people who never advance from minimum wage jobs or who qualify for and require food stamps for extended (years, decades) periods.

Not having enough money to eat healthily while on food stamps is then an institutional problem and not a problem with individual choice. It can only be fixed by the institution. Even if you once knew a person who ate nothing but organic locally sourced fresh veg and meat and whole grains while feeding a family of 10 on foodstamps and cullings from her personal garden. That would be an exceptional INDIVIDUAL case and not a viable solution to the INSTITUTIONAL problem of emergency food assistance not being enough to eat healthily over the long haul.

And Peterson seems to get that, mostly. But then the end of the post includes a bunch of links about how to eat healthy on food stamps. It changes to focus back to bootstrapping individualism instead of social justice institutionalism. While those links may be mildly helpful for a few food stamp participants, they water down the message of institutional change.

though that is probably being to hard on horses. You might remember Mr. Dimon as the fuckface who went to Davos and complained about us poors calling him mean names. Sticks and stones Jamie. If you don’t want to be called a lying, thieving asswipe bankster then stop being one.

So today he’s whinging on about how if we default on the national debt it’s a moral disaster or something. The good news is that in comments on the Gawker piece Modern Monetary Theory is being bandied about a little bit.

(Do we need a quick and dirty guide on the national debt? I could do one if you all would like.)